🔗 Share this article

I possess a few thoughts regarding that remarks made by the sports network commentator a well-known announcer after Novak Djokovic's win over the American player in the New York major last eight. Look – Fritz is American, the commentator is American – and sports often encourage patriotic sentiment. A little bit of disappointment was understandable. Rather, he invoked the ongoing absence of American men at grand slam tournaments: none of them had lifted a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the competition.

Everyone enjoy a storyline, myself included. But really. Suppose the American defeated Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was waiting in the following match, whom Fritz has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And had he somehow gotten past that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, against whom Fritz had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also divided the previous seven grand slams (and the Spaniard proceeded to defeat a tired Serbian in the subsequent match). He stated in post-match interviews after the loss that he actually preferred his draw, because it offered the opportunity to beat the three best players in the world in succession. Fritz is well within his right to aim for the achievement; an athlete is meant to believe in themselves. But entering that Serbian last eight match what other person sensibly had the lack of US winners in mind?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the only thing standing in her way and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is ranked number four in the global rankings starting the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has won his previous six matches over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. It's likely he might take that spot for himself in the future. But it’s clear that right now, that’s as far as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard sit a chasm of ranking points away. Fritz’s elite delivery and powerful power on each forehand and reverse side are sufficiently enough to defeat most opponents on the ATP tour. Against the select few generational talents, however, he is frequently helpless. The past few years has witnessed the interesting rise of lanky, towering players who can nonetheless move around with the alarming quickness and fluidity of much shorter players. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His movement is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the other player was dictating, and playing a soft shot versus him is usually a reliable tactic. That serves as a pretty harsh limitation on his upside.

The American has achieved a number of dramatic, improbable improvements over the years. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the lower end of the world's best thirty. Two years after, he was sniffing the elite ten. Last year, he suddenly surged to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and even a declining Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What was Fowler have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the ongoing drought of American men winning major titles when Fritz had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the respect for the magnitude of the task too little.

Taylor Fritz made a career-best run to the Wimbledon semi-finals in July.

Fritz’s performance in that very quarter-final ought to have been sufficient of an sign. The Serbian won in four sets, a victory that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the very end, when the American had survived a couple championship opportunities and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the rallies, with the American creating plenty of opportunities to break. But the champion rescued break point after break point, extending the run to the point of agony. When he finally did claim a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a horrendous game to lose his own serve again; the Serbian had drawn him into a battle secondary to the real battle and forced him to expend excessive energy to prevail. Facing set points in the final game, his primary delivery sailed to the sky. He extended the match twice on his backup delivery, but ultimately double-faulted. It wasn’t a collapse, I didn’t think, only a consequence of needing to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The match was fairly ironclad proof that Fritz is not good enough to defeat any version of the Serbian, who was defeated by the Spaniard in the next round and never especially appeared like he thought he could win. This is absolutely fine – the Serbian is the best player ever, and might not be at the peak of his athletic abilities anymore, but has acquired sufficient knowledge and strategic intelligence to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The issue is those who were anticipating the American to win, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was had not done anything that suggested he would.

Fritz is an asset to the tour regardless. He’s a patient, thoughtful presence in press conferences, exceeding virtually everyone on the men's tour except for the Russian star, willing to not just say how he feels or the strategy he believed decided a match, but clarify it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the blame for the United States not produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Now that Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, maybe they can divide that load.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

American legend Group

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• The German powerhouse
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably dwell on it indefinitely if I don’t do it,” Fritz told an interviewer in the summer of claiming a major. It is hoped he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable reign is actually highly improbable for everybody else. {